Skip to content


Leadership is action! It’s what you do that counts, not what you say

Managers have subordinates, leaders have followers.

That short statement took me many years to learn. When I was young, and thrust into a management role way before I was ready, I thought leadership meant “getting people to do things”. And maybe, in the end, that is what it is. But it’s not by telling, or coercing or bribing. It’s way more subtle than that. And if you are looking to carve out a career in managing a recruitment business, developing your leadership abilities will be key to your success as a manager of recruiters.

Consultants are typically demanding, fickle, selfish even. Merely managing the process won’t be enough for you to build an exceptional business.

The good news is that leadership can be learned. It can be improved.

And it has to be  — because creating an environment where people want to do things, rather than feel they have to, is the difference between great and mediocre. And yet leadership is so hard to define and so hard to find in our industry as well.

But perhaps it’s not surprising. Because it is true that many of us in management roles in recruitment have been promoted into leadership positions because we were good recruiters. Or we started our own business, hoping initially to just survive, but our energy and drive finds us now with teams of people to lead. We may, if we are lucky have learned to manage along the way, but who ever taught us about true leadership? What is it? What does a leader do? How does a leader behave?

To really make this point, I am going to pose a question. It’s rhetorical, but it’s directed at anyone reading this who is, or wants to be, a leader.

“Why would anyone want to be led by you”?

It’s a frightening question. And with good reason. You cannot do anything in this business without followers. We know it’s all about the people. And in these “empowered”, Generation Y times, followers are hard to find, right? People don’t follow blindly, and they don’t simply do what they are told – unless they believe. So managers of recruitment businesses had better know what it takes to lead effectively. You must find ways to engage people and rouse their commitment to the company goals.

But first, what are we talking about when we say “leadership”?

Well, there are many definitions. But, in this industry, knowing the psyche of the average recruitment consultant, I believe it’s best encapsulated by two, linked characteristics.

You see, I have come to understand that the people who matter to us most are NOT the ones with the most credentials. People we look up to are not the ones with the most money or the most awards. The people who matter, the ones that we  respect and will ultimately follow, are the ones that care and the ones who’ve made a difference in our lives.

That is leadership at the level we should be focused on now. Leaders will be judged by their ability to impact people and make a difference.

Think of your own history in the recruitment business. Is there a person or two who made a difference, taught you things, mentored, and influenced your values? Showed faith when others didn’t. Inspired you through their actions? That’s leadership. And that’s who we have to be for the next wave of recruiters coming through.

So there we have it defined. Leadership is about truly caring and about making a meaningful difference. Leadership is not about talking a good game. It’s not about thumping the table like some deranged half-time football coach. It’s not about dreaming up an esoteric vision statement that no one believes in or acts on.

Leadership is Action

It’s what you do that counts. It’s your behaviour that people will remember and emulate. It’s your example that people will follow.

Leadership is action.

Posted in Leadership, Management Skills, Recruitment.

Tagged with , , , .


Kiwi Recruiters. Linked In or left out?

During my recent RCSA speaking tour around Australasia I spoke to over 500 Australian and 150 New Zealander recruiters, on the upbeat topic of ‘Riding the Recovery’.

I have to admit it was refreshing to talk about positive ideas and strategies to ensure we take advantage of the opportunities presented by an economic revival.

One of the key areas I covered was the use of Social Media as a sourcing and influencing tool for our industry going forward. I have already blogged on my finding that Australian recruiters use Twitter in tiny numbers and followed that up with a similar story on New Zealand. However, I also used this opportunity to survey (by show of hands, so not very scientific), the use of LinkedIn by New Zealand recruiters.

It turns out that in Auckland and Christchurch, only about 70% of recruiters have a LinkedIn Account (I have to say I am wondering what the other 30% are waiting for). However when asked whether their LinkedIn accounts were worked ‘actively’ with status updates, participation in groups and all the other available applications, only between 10% and 20% kept hands raised.

I am no LinkedIn expert, but it seems self-evident that it’s a great branding tool, a fantastic sourcing tool and an exceptional way to connect with otherwise inaccessible people-not to mention its research capabilities.

I have spoken to clients who acknowledge freely that the first thing they do when assessing a new recruitment service provider, is to review their LinkedIn profile, including an evaluation of history, stability and quality of the recruiters network.

Personally, I could do far more with my LinkedIn account. However I do review it every day, participate in groups, answer questions, update my status and add connections every week.  I have also connected my blog and Twitter account  to my Linked In page, making an attempt to integrate my Social Media messaging and content.  And it works. Even though I am only using the free functionality of Linked In, so far I have hired new Aquent employees from LinkedIn, won clients, secured speaking engagements and generated publicity in many countries and many media.

So Kiwi recruiters, let’s get with the programme. Slow to buy into Twitter I can half understand.

But if you are not LinkedIn… you surely will be left out.

Posted in Personal Branding, Recruitment, Social Networking.

Tagged with , , , , , , .


Forget the hype. New Zealand Recruiters do not use Twitter!

Over the past week I have conducted RCSA seminars for over 150 New Zealand Recruiters in Auckland and Christchurch. The topic was “Riding the Recovery” and part of my session was on Social Media and how we need to build that technology into our talent sourcing strategies.

Well, I grabbed this opportunity to conduct a little mini-survey on the Twitter habits of attendees. It was totally unscientific and very impromptu, so take from this what you will, but I was somewhat surprised to find that only 5% of the attendees (by show of hands) in Auckland, and probably even less in Christchurch, actually have a Twitter account at all.

I am not sure what I expected. Having done a similar survey in three large Australian cities late last year, I should have been prepared because the Australian average was only between 5% and 10% as well. But on the other hand, Australians and New Zealanders are massive early-adopters of technology, and at the general level have swarmed into Social Media use. Why not recruiters?

I think this is going to have to change  - and fast.  New Zealand recruiters won’t be able to rely on job boards for candidates going forward. The cream of candidates, especially passive ones, will need to be sourced through an increasingly fragmented variety of channels. In my view Social Media will be one of those channels.

But for recruiters, Twitter will be far more than a simple source of candidates to fill todays’ job order. More important than that is that smart use of Social Media is an opportunity to be perceived as an expert in your industry niche. Recruiters are going to need to use Twitter to foster relationships (and not to spam people by the way), build credibility, and actually interact with communities of people they might want to place in the future, or who are influencers in their area of interest. That will be increasingly powerful for those who get it right.

In my view it’s like this. Social media remains a TOOL – not a strategy – to reach people. There are still tons of people who will not be found on social networking sites. Recruiters don’t want to be seduced by Social Media and the hype surrounding it — but equally recruiters  must acknowledge its’ role, and figure out how to work it into the talent acquisition mix

So Kiwis (and Aussies, by the way) get to it!  Build  social media into your communications armory. When that talent shortage comes roaring back, you are going to need it!

Posted in Personal Branding, Recruitment, Social Networking, Technology.

Tagged with , , , , , , , .


It’s not me, it’s you! Why I won’t follow you on Twitter.

I am no social media expert. I am not even that familiar with the ‘ins and outs’ of Twitter, although I have built up 1700 followers during my six month as a Tweeter. Truthfully, I only plunged into the social media world, including this blog, because I am a recruiter, and I run a business that works in the digital and marketing arena. I felt I needed to know what the medium offered, how it worked, what I could contribute to the conversation, and how our clients and talent could benefit it from it.What better way to do that than diving right in!

And even though I am learning, I am in no position to offer advice on how to use the social networks.

But I can tell you why I won’t follow you back on Twitter.

I suppose I get 5 -10 new followers a day on average. And when I get time – it might be a few days later — I will click on each of their Twitter profiles and see who they are and what they talk about. And, often, I will follow them back if I feel they will add to the conversation and help me build my knowledge and reach. I imagine most people do the same.

But often I won’t follow back. And just recently I was pondering why I  choose not to press ‘follow’. My first thought was that the decision was simply intuitive. But when I went deeper, I realised that I do have a sort of mental check-list I flick through when deciding to follow, or not.

Firstly I look at the picture or avatar of the new follower. No avatar is a big #fail, and personally I prefer a real picture of a real person. Twitter is about engagement and conversation, and it’s so much easier for that to happen if you have an image of the person you are tweeting with.

Then I read their most recent tweets. That is key. Lots of one-word Tweets or meaningless phrases and it’s a ‘no follow’. Loads of trivial stuff about how much beer was drunk last Friday, or what they like on toast in the morning, also means ‘no follow’. Self-promoting ads for products or services, or endless streams of automatically generated tweets and it’s a no-go too. I also tend not to follow people who tweet bad language, or who have a penchant for being routinely argumentative and mean-spirited in their comments. That is not what Twitter is about for me and certainly not what I want to see in my Twitter stream each day.

Of course I read the bio. I am looking for some connection. In my case a recruiter, or a marketer, or someone in design. But any field can still get a follow from me, if the bio is interesting and well-written. No bio means almost certainly no follow.

My next criteria is location. Not that I will eliminate anyone because of where they live! No, in fact the worldwide reach of Twitter is a major appeal. But if there is no location on the profile, it leaves a gap in my mental picture of who this is and so they are less interesting and less trusted.

I am always disappointed if the new follower does not list their web address. A link to a blog or a company website obviously adds huge insight to who the person is. It adds credibility too, and it will certainly weigh heavily in my decision to follow you back or not.

But it doesn’t end there. I usually have a quick look at your following/follower ratio. This is not a deal breaker, but in conjunction with other measures, such as Tweet content, can be a knock-out factor. For example, you are following 9697 people and three are following you back. That is a problem.

Twitter, like a lot of technology, can waste lots of time. But I want to extract value out of my involvement on Twitter. So I am rigorous in screening who I follow, and I expect others will be with me too. It’s worth the effort because you end up with a Tweetdeck full of interesting relevant comment at best – and humorous, harmless chit-chat at worst.

Posted in Personal Branding, Recruitment, Social Networking, Technology.

Tagged with , , .


‘Large metallic balls’ or not, customer experience is the pathway to recruiting greatness

It has been a while since I had a really good laugh reading something on the internet, but apparently this item caused me great mirth, because even people on the other side of the office came over to see what all the fuss was about.

Yes, the article on Skrentny Speaks where I am described as having ‘large metallic balls that most in the profession can’t even touch‘ cheered me up for its political incorrectness as much as for the implied compliment.

Skrentny was referring to Aquents’ drive to improve the customer experience, and our new strategy where we survey customer satisfaction every quarter and reward consultants on customer feedback. He is a fan of our initiative, and goes as far as saying ‘This attention to our buyers is why the best of us have survived year after year against the big boys’.

I continued on the theme of the appalling state of customer service across the recruitment industry in my latest blog, and the comments on the blog, via twitter and in the recruitment press, have been lively and mostly favourable.

At Aquent, we have a whole raft of internal customer service delivery agreements, but for us, or indeed any recruiter, I feel there are several key ‘moments of truth’ where candidates can be turned into raving fans (or lifelong critics). So many recruiters get this so wrong. Plenty in the staffing business think finding a candidate a job covers up all other sins. This is patently not correct, and I know many candidates have been found new roles by recruiters they subsequently despise for their arrogance, lack of respect and non-existent communication. What the candidates who are not found new roles think, I hate to ponder.

And the reverse is true too. My good friend Graham Whelan, who founded a company with me in the 1980s called Recruitment Solutions (which we subsequently took to an IPO, after building it nationwide) is a case in point. Graham is probably the best recruiter I have ever known. He had such a high quality attitude and service delivery to his candidates,  that we worked out that Recruitment Solutions were taking two to three new job orders a week from previous candidates of Graham, who were now in a hiring position. Interestingly, the vast majority of these were people he had not placed! Why? Well, it seems that returning phones calls, giving honest advice, empathy and doing what you say you are going to do, so differentiated Grahams’ service to candidates, that they never forgot him, and sought him out when they were in the client role.

Seriously, ponder the implications of that for a moment.

And it’s not that hard. Key  ’moments of truth’ we are focussing on at Aquent include;

  • The period of time between initial interview with us and the first temp assignment (or perm role referral). This is critical. The talent has taken time to come and see us. We have spent an hour together. A relationship is established. Communications expectations are set. This is when the recruiter must deliver. The candidate is vulnerable and keen to hear next steps. The recruiter needs to actively engage with the talent whether there is an assignment on offer or not. Keep them informed. Advise on the market. Advise on progress with their job search.
  • The post first interview stage after a permanent role interview. This is a burning moment of truth. The candidate has seen the client. They are “dying” to know more. Many recruiters leave them hanging. This is especially true if the recruiter learns that a particular candidate is not favoured by the client. That is the time to communicate with the talent and manage their expectations.
  • On a long-term temp assignment. It is an irony, but a long term temp will make more money for the recruiter than the biggest of perm fees. But often the temp is never contacted by the agency who placed them. It’s a major criticism of the staffing industry. And it’s dumb business. That contractor is generating income for you every day. Nurture them. Keep in touch. Show appreciation. They can be your biggest advocate or your most vocal critic… to your client.

So in our view ‘customer experience’ is the key differentiator for recruiters going forward.

Do YOU have the balls for it?

Posted in Recruitment, customer service.

Tagged with , , , , , .


Guess what? Candidates are customers too!

Last week I blogged on the importance of customer service in the recruitment industry, and how Aquent is surveying customer satisfaction, and rewarding our staff based on customer feedback

My story was picked up by recruitment journalists in Australia and the UK, and I have been fascinated by the feedback this concept has received. Comments on my blog are all favorable, but I have also had feedback that the concept is flawed because our staff  ’will be worrying about satisfying customers instead of focussing on making money’. In particular, some critics regard spending too much time on candidates as foolhardy because, in the words of one individual, ‘Candidates don’t pay your fees’.

Frankly, this kind of comment gives me tremendous encouragement. That competitors in the staffing industry can be so naive, and so blind to the power of referral, recommendation and repeat business, driven by satisfied customers, makes me very confident about the future of Aquent, and the careers of our staff.

Two days after my blog, came an article in the Australian on-line newsletter Recruiter Daily.  Robert Godden, a HR consultant with People Magic conducted research that involved collecting 85 job ads (50 with agencies, 35 with employers), all of which invited potential applicants to call a specific person for more information.

In the course of making 85 phone calls, Godden was only able to reach seven of the nominated contacts, all of whom were from agencies.He left 76 messages for the remaining recruiters (after two numbers rang out).The “unbelievable” result of the experiment was that only seven recruiters returned Godden’s calls — less than 10 per cent.

After ringing 50 of the numbers again a week later, he got through to two recruiters and only a further four (out of 48) returned his messages – again, less than 10 per cent.

As a career recruiter, proud of what we do, I find this result supremely depressing. We run expensive ads and invite people (customers in my view) to call us. Then we ignore them. It is disrespectful. It’s a sad indictment of the way recruiters are managed and coached. But it is also a supreme opportunity. An opportunity for forward thinking recruiters to differentiate and provide a level of service that leaves customers “wowed,” Frankly right now, it seems just returning a call might ‘wow’ most candidates replying to ads.

Talent is the only real currency a staffing company has. It’s what clients pay us for and it’s going to get increasingly difficult to access quality talent as the recovery takes hold. Job boards will become less effective and in any event they only tap into the active talent market. The recruitment company that owns the talent market.. will own the market

Candidates as customers? It’s a no brainer surely!

At Aquent we have a global strategy to improve the client and talent experience. We know we have much work to do. But we are tackling the task with gusto. We plan to stand out by hiring people with the right attitude, coaching customer service standards, measuring our customer satisfaction independently, and then rewarding staff according to what the customer thinks.

Posted in Employee engagement, Personal Branding, Recruitment, Recruitment Skills, customer service.

Tagged with , , , , , .


Customer service in Recruitment. We need to put our money where our mouth is

Read the websites of any ten random recruitment companies. From any country. In the ‘About Us’ or ‘Our Services’ section, you will almost certainly find glowing and poetic prose about ‘customer service’ and the ‘customer comes first’ and ‘exceptional standards of service delivery’ and many other cliche-ridden  phrases. But these claims were not written without sincerity. The companies professing to provide flawless service intended that to be the case I am sure. The desire to be excellent is real in most cases.

It is the delivery on the service promise that is the problem. All companies, in all industries, find it challenging to consistently deliver top service across a broad customer base. Indeed, it takes a very special business to do that.

But recruitment is in a class of its own when it comes to over-promising and under-delivering.

Recruitment and staffing is a special case because we ask our recruiters to deliver on the customer experience, but then we reward them largely for the dollars they individually generate, regardless of how many candidates and clients they burn along the way. So there is a mismatch of message and of motivation.

At Aquent, one of our key global objectives is to demonstrate the best customer service and loyalty in the staffing industry worldwide. But that lofty goal can’t be measured by self-acclimation! It has to be empirical and unbiased.  So we have engaged  Inavero, a specialist customer-satisfaction survey firm – focussing in the staffing and professional service arena – to survey our customer base, in every one of our 70 offices, every six months

We have introduced a customer service charter across our business, set up local task-forces to drive response times for talent and clients, and now we survey what our customers think of us on a regular basis. And trust me when I tell you it’s a scary thing to do! People don’t hold back, and some individual remarks via the survey can sting! And in some cases, where we have let our customers down, it’s well deserved. But the key thing is that we are able to quickly move into service-recovery mode. Even more telling, we get an overall customer satisfaction score for each business unit, and we can track quarterly improvement and change.

And that is super cool! But we have gone one step further

From January 2010 all Aquent Agents (consultants) in the International business now have a big chunk of their compensation linked to improvements in these customer service scores. So at Aquent we compensate people with a fair base salary, and exceptional results attract meaningful bonuses, as is true of most of our industry. But now our recruiters can earn a 25% “kicker” on top of their bonus, if their Inavero customer score meets the set benchmark of improvement and excellence.

Of course Aquent is a commercial enterprise. Revenue and profit is our lifeblood. But so is brand and reputation and self-esteem of our own staff. And frankly, providing exceptional customer service is directly linked to commercial success anyway. Great recruitment firms will differentiate their offering in two distinct ways, I believe. Firstly, by specialisation and depth of knowledge, and secondly through exceptional customer service.

But talking about customer service can become a stream of so many cliches. Meaningless spin without substance and without any grunt behind it to actually drive better customer experience.

At Aquent we will not be duped by our own PR. We measure what the customers think. We cop what they tell us on the chin. We work out ways to fix the problems.

And then we reward our staff  when the customers are happy

Posted in Management Skills, Recruitment, customer service.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , .


Integrity. It’s a bit like virginity. Either you have it…or you don’t!

I have been in business a long time. And all of that time has been in the rough and tumble world of recruitment and staffing. Having worked as a recruiter, manager, and owner of recruitment businesses all over the world, I have seen my share of dubious business practices. Indeed I have, sadly, been witness to many instances of outrageously deceitful and unethical behavior. We have all seen it no doubt.

In business, as in life generally, we expect to confront people who are dishonest. We know they are there, and we become better at identifying them before too much harm is done. But what really gets me is that category of person in business who preaches ethical behavior, even believes they are whiter than white, but when put to the mildest of tests, will collapse in a heap of moral compromise at best, and resort to outright duplicity at worst.

In a strange way I have even come to prefer dealing with crooks who knows they are crooks, rather then those people who believe there are degrees of honesty. People who somehow feel you can leverage acting decently against the amount of money involved. You cannot. Honesty is like being a virgin. You are, or you are not. You can’t be a virgin when it suits you.

I remember  a conversation with a manager a long time ago that sticks with me as an example. I had recently taken over a business, and inherited some of the middle-management. The situation was that we had billed a client a large fee. The placement was made in Asia and the fee was in Singapore dollars. The client, based in the US, paid the invoice with US dollars, a value that was almost double the original, correct amount. I asked the manager of the office handling the deal “what do you propose to do”? The reply was  along the lines of,  ”well normally I would tell the client about the error, but this is a large fee and we are having a poor month in my office, so I feel we should let it slide”.  Of course I quickly smothered that idea, but I knew I had a serious problem. What is the mindset of a person who will effectively steal from our clients? What is the moral fortitude of someone who will compromise any standard of honesty “because they are having a poor month”.

In 2009 I saw so many examples of this “rubber-band morality”. Clients, candidates and others closer to home, have managed to surprise even me with how tenuous is their grasp of what is right, and what is wrong. Yes, times are tough and money is tight. But what we have to understand is that it’s in exactly these circumstances that honesty and moral strength counts. Anyone can be ‘ethical’ if there is no temptation to test your ethical fibre. It’s very easy to see yourself as ‘honest’ if there is nothing financial at stake to give you pause for thought.

I love the competitive nature of the recruitment business. Anyone I have worked with or against will attest that I ask nor give any quarter in the commercial battle. Winning is important. Success is what we strive for.

But not at any cost.

To me its obvious that in business, or indeed any commercial interaction, you play it as hard as you can, but stick by the rules, retain your humanity and ensure that you will always be able to look every person you deal with in the eye.

Don’t be like a client who said to me once, as he lied his way out of paying a bill , “Greg, I am an honest man, but business is business”

Sad and pathetic

Posted in Ethics, Leadership, Personal Branding, Recruitment.

Tagged with , , , , .


Employee engagement. Not child’s play, but we can learn from our kids

In the world of managing staffing companies, I imagine the last 12 months are up there amongst the hardest ever. For us at Aquent, despite our market leading position, we have had to respond to declining demand with staff reductions, reduced hours and a range of spending cuts. Good commercial sense of course, and our business is in prime shape because of it, but it pays not to underestimate the human toll.

I have been travelling a lot around the business lately and it’s obvious our people are bruised by a very challenging year. Faith in the company remains rock solid I am pleased to say, but no employer should take staff engagement for granted, and this will never be so true as the market recovers and people consider their options.

Of course I was well aware of the challenge of morale, engagement and staff retention right through the downturn, but a little scenario has been playing out even closer to home than Aquent, that has driven this lesson home to me recently.

I have a 19-year-old daughter, just completing second year of a Bachelor of Business in Marketing at University in Sydney. (I will call her ‘M‘ here because mentioning her name on my blog will provoke World War 3 at home). Being a true child of her generation, ‘M’ can’t envisage life without a car, massive mobile phone bills, and a not inconsiderable social life. Equally, I can’t imagine a world where I pay for these trappings of her good life.

So ‘M’ has a job. And it’s a good job too – on the surface. For reasons soon to become clear, I won’t mention her employers’ name, but she has a retail role in one of the flagship outlets. It’s well paid too, and with Sunday overtime, it keeps her in the style she feels she deserves, while enabling her to complete university as well.

Having a father in the recruitment industry is a double edged sword for ‘M’ however, because I encouraged her (vigorously) to also look for experience in a field closer to her career goal. And to her credit she secured  “work experience” with Pulse Communications, a successful PR company, which is part of the STW Communications Group in Sydney. This arrangement is like an internship and she has worked every Friday at Pulse for the last three months. Great experience, but unpaid.

Now this is where it gets interesting. ‘M’ detests her well paid ‘real’ job. People are cold and disinterested. They operate in cliques that exclude newcomers. Her boss doesn’t work the days she does, so she has never met her! On one occasion the supervisor left at 4 pm and all five of the other employees working on the same shift as ‘M’, moved out back into the staff room and stayed there until closing time. The fact they had left a trainee to handle a long line of irate customers, while they smoked and joked, apparently caused them no concern at all. The culture is such that when she arrives for work a cheerful “good morning” is met with stony silence more often than not. When she leaves maybe one person out of five will say goodbye. The tiniest error is met with derision and scolding. I was saddened to have her tell me she goes to work with “a heavy feeling of dread in her stomach”.

But Pulse is so different. As I warned her she would, she stacks boxes and stuffs envelopes, but they have also give her interesting research and include her in client meetings as an observer. On her second day she was invited to lunch with the team celebrating a big win. People know her name, include her in all goings on, and the CEO asks her how things are going. She loves going there, and has learned so much she has been totally re-enthused about a career in communications.

I was stunned and delighted be told by ‘M’ that during her (obscenely long) Uni vacation, she has volunteered to work at Pulse three days a week. And she is not paid one cent.

So what do we learn from this? ‘M’ hates her paid job and only turns up for the money. She does her best, but no doubt her unhappiness must show in her customer service – or at least it will eventually. She is looking for a new job and will leave as soon as she can. But Pulse, where she is not even paid, brings a sparkle to her eye. She looks forward to going there. She speaks in awe of the people who work there, and has taken a renewed interest in her university studies as a result.

And so I reflected on this lesson. I am not expecting anyone at Aquent to volunteer for three days unpaid work a week any time soon (!) But the importance of creating a culture and an environment where people want to be is clearer than ever. Commercial success is important, but so is belief in the business and a return on our efforts that are to measured in fun and self-respect as well as dollars

I will be working with the senior Aquent management team to create just such a work place at Aquent.

Posted in Employee engagement, Leadership, Management Skills.

Tagged with , .


What future for recruiting? (Guest blog from Bill Boorman)

For a while now I’ve been changing my views on the future of recruiting. I have a feeling that the market is going to look quite different once we have shaken off the shackles of recession. I didn’t always think this way, but over the last year I have been building a fantastic network via social media channels. My network consists of an eclectic mix of HR professionals, Recruiters, Vendors, technologists and others that live around the talent area globally. This combined input which has come via twitter, my 3 radio shows on blog talk radio, various blogs, linked in, latterly the wave and other channels have led me to these conclusions. This is how I see recruiting evolving over the next 3 years in a nutshell.

1: Corporate companies that have looked to cut cost during tough times will continue to do so in the boom times. I see this taking over much of the generalist market with HR teams taking on much of the lower end recruiting and traditional recruiters retreating further in to specialist niches where they can show real expertise.

2: The upshot of this will be more generalist recruiters opting for a very low cost option based on the job boards. The latest figures out of Australia demonstrate that the post and pray method still dominates the sector. This was very much the standard delivery model during the boom year’s post 94, where speed was valued ahead of quality of service to either the candidates or the clients. I don’t blame recruiters for this; both the clients and candidates drove the market this way by creating intense competition for limited resource. Post recession, the corporate recruiters have wised up to this and realised that they might as well do this themselves at a greatly reduced cost. Those recruiters that are unable or unwilling to change what they have always done have increasingly resorted to low fee or flat fee charging relying on volume. I believe this model combined with direct recruiting will dominate this end of the market.

3: Recruiters will continue to find new ways of offering the same service. Packaged and priced differently. An over populated market means more need to change their offering to differentiate. Over the last months I’ve seen models that pay large bounties for referrals from the network, that charge a fee based on time spent regardless of result or volume of recruiting, recruiters who have switched to providing a managed consultancy service charging for outputs in work over hourly charges and even Aquent have moved to a purely exclusive or retained basis, changing the way they interact with clients in the process. I applaud this creativity but equally believe it will change the recruiting landscape. Essentially the job we do will be the same, but we will package it very differently.

4: Recruiters will continue not to get social media. Despite the outraged posturing of the many bloggers and commentators this is actually o.k. I say this because the majority of the global population are much the same. Forget the stats you see, if you conduct a poll on LinkedIn asking how many recruiters have recruited via LinkedIn, unsurprisingly the results look favourably on the channel from where the opinion was elicited. Rather controversially I also believe that those recruiters that don’t get it won’t disappear. Personally I’m rather glad not many do, because it leaves the field open and unpolluted for those of us that understand the best way to network. The volume of recruiters that do nothing in LinkedIn groups other than posting jobs demonstrates the risk of damage to recruiter’s reputation as a whole by not contributing.

5: Relationships between clients and candidates will become the currency of the market. Increasingly, wise recruiters will return to managing fewer candidates that they understand properly (as a result of interview over registration) will change the way candidates choose who they want to represent them. Candidates in skill short markets will know they hold the balance of power and will be looking for real partners in their job search over those that do little for them. Equally, clients will choose to work with fewer recruiters and will expect regular contact, feedback and help. They will also look to their suppliers to be subject experts that can advise and help rather than purely process.

These are my thoughts for the coming year. I’d love to hear if you disagree! Be ambassadors for the business!

Twitter: @BillBoorman

Blog: http://recruitingunblog.wordpress.com/

Website: http://www.billboorman.co.uk

Email: bill@billboorman.co.uk

Posted in Recruitment.




Bad Behavior has blocked 197 access attempts in the last 7 days.